The tabloids (and broadsheets, which ape them) continually report nauseating violence catalysed by alcohol, while screaming irrational abuse at drugs: so the switch is made -- repetition renders alcohol and its effects invisible while 'drugs' are blamed for the very ills that alcohol causes: addiction, disease, insensitivity, violence, ignorance, financial waste and spiritual degradation on a scale so vast as to be invisible and ungraspable.

Why does the media side with man's parasitic predators instead of with their fellow men? Partly because the function of the press is to promote tension, conflict, war, and thus to sell more newspapers, partly because they are dependent on 'government' (al/nic/caff) advertising, and are among those who profit directly from this filthy traffic in men's (and children's) bodies and souls, and partly the press attitudes reflect the vulgar, immoral and power-addicted life-styles of the proprietors and hacks who operate this shameful 'industry.'

A typical Murdoch editorial in the gutter press [SUN July 1993] is headlined: WAR DECLARED [journalists' favourite headline of all time!] Drugs are an evil eating away at society [this profound and original sentiment is underlined and in bold type] The Sun's investigation last week showed that no town is safe. Now the Prime Minister has ordered tough, united action. [No town is safe from what? drug-crazed hippies, or drunken louts?] He is right to do so. [this keenly awaited verdict is given in italics: after all, if the SUN says he is right, that about wraps up the debate!] Heads [continues the editorial] need banging together at many government agencies. [that, at least is undeniable: head banging is a traditional and well proven method of education, bound to promote creative co-operation! ---- and finally the utter give-away in bold type and underlined...] The war on drugs is too important to be spoiled by squabbles. [that is, it is not achieving peace which is important ---- it is the war which must not be spoiled, but maintained at all costs (to whom?) because the drugwar generates revenue, power and influence for newspaper proprietors and distracts from the monumental (drug) swindle perpetrated on a gullible public by certain yeasts and plants, and their treacherous allies in power!]

The same issue of the yellow press which published the above editorial, carried the following harrowing but commonplace story about a decent young man battered to death for no reason by ethanolic thugs:

"Gentle James was attacked by martial arts fans Dean Russell 18, and Carl Lewis, 23, as he headed home from his part-time job as a waiter.

A court heard on Thursday that the two were "hell-bent on giving someone a good hiding" after downing five pints each and watching a pub kick-boxing contest. The pair, from Dudley, had beaten up two other ment before turning on James. Russell grabbed him by his long hair and battered him to death."

Control is exercised through habit: consider shepherds and dog-handlers ... Thus agencies which occupy themselves with control, such as governments (international large-scale drug cartels legitimised by the media), police, schools and prisons, promote narcotic behaviour -- 'full employment,' industrial manufacture -- mostly planned-obsolescent motor cars, McDonalds etc. and similar life, soul and planet-destroying activity at the expense of non-routine imaginative, creative behaviour.

Caffeine, alcohol and nicotine, despite the gross physical and mental damage which accrues in the long term, and the interim continuous vitiation of life's multiplex fascinating possibilities, are the drugs of choice in a population engaged in destructive repetitious psychotic activity, brainwashed by traitors to their species who promote these parasitic life-forms for their own short-term gain, to keep the populace 'down', that is too busy with stereotyped habitual activity to question its worth or to wonder who are the true beneficiaries of their 'work'.

But times change, technology develops, perceptions reconfigure, and no doubt, in time, there will be a reckoning.